<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discover Canada: Historians respond to Canada&#8217;s new citizenship guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://activehistory.ca/2009/11/discover-canada-historians-respond-to-canadas-new-citizenship-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://activehistory.ca/2009/11/discover-canada-historians-respond-to-canadas-new-citizenship-guide/</link>
	<description>History Matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:08:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Marquis</title>
		<link>http://activehistory.ca/2009/11/discover-canada-historians-respond-to-canadas-new-citizenship-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-1218</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Marquis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://activehistory.ca/?p=454#comment-1218</guid>
		<description>Hello:

I have taught Canadian history at the university level since the 1980s-the government&#039;s attempt to force an &#039;official history&#039; on newcomers seems both naive and coercive. Generations of native-born Canadians have been unable to agree on their own history, or project a single vision of a national history. Is this not one of the main themes of an undergraduate course or textbook in Canadian history?

This is not only a departure from the currents of academic History, it is also a departure from our actual history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p>
<p>I have taught Canadian history at the university level since the 1980s-the government&#8217;s attempt to force an &#8216;official history&#8217; on newcomers seems both naive and coercive. Generations of native-born Canadians have been unable to agree on their own history, or project a single vision of a national history. Is this not one of the main themes of an undergraduate course or textbook in Canadian history?</p>
<p>This is not only a departure from the currents of academic History, it is also a departure from our actual history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Busby</title>
		<link>http://activehistory.ca/2009/11/discover-canada-historians-respond-to-canadas-new-citizenship-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Busby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://activehistory.ca/?p=454#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>A very good summary. If I may, I&#039;d like to point out &lt;a href=&quot;http://knowbc.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-guide-shortchanges-bc.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Daniel Francis&lt;/a&gt;&#039; brief, but worthwhile, comments from our westernmost province.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good summary. If I may, I&#8217;d like to point out <a href="http://knowbc.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-guide-shortchanges-bc.html" rel="nofollow">Daniel Francis</a>&#8216; brief, but worthwhile, comments from our westernmost province.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
