The Haundenosaunee/Six Nations and the Royal Proclamation of 1763

By Keith Jamieson

THE COVENANT CHAIN RELATIONSHIP

The Haudenosaunee/Six Nations have a very different understanding of the Royal Proclamation of 1763.  While the document stated the process by which the Crown would engage native people in acquiring lands for settlement, it also asserted the sovereignty of the Crown over all people in North America.  To the Haudenosaunee, this unilateral proclamation would have been considered as not applicable to them.  It was contrary to the long-standing Covenant Chain relationship they had already agreed to with the Crown.

In order to grasp this understanding more fully, one needs to understand the progression of wampum belt agreements over time  – those agreements that preceded the Proclamation and those that followed.  The Two Row wampum belt was formalized between the Haudenosaunee and the Dutch in 1613, as a foundation for the relationship between two sovereign nations, represented by their individual governments.  In 1667, the British, having supplanted the Dutch in North America, sought to secure an alliance with the Haudenosaunee for trade purposes.  They entered into the Covenant Chain, a relationship of “respect, trust and friendship.”  As part of this relationship, the Haudenosaunee stipulated, “We will not be as Father and Son, but like Brothers.”  Simultaneously, the French had established trading relationships with nations to the northeast.

BEAVER HUNTING GROUNDS

In 1701, the British entered into the Nanfan Treaty with the nations of the Great Lakes.  This treaty established the “Beaver Hunting Grounds,” a territory that was acknowledged as shared between the nations who participated in the treaty.  This included the Haudenosaunee.  The Beaver Hunting Grounds was a territory that spanned most of the Great Lakes and into the Ohio River Valley.  By covering such an expanse of land, one could suggest that the Nanfan Treaty was an effort by the British to counter French ambitions of domination over the fur trade and to assert British authority.  Between 1667 and 1763, the Covenant Chain between the Haudenosaunee and the British was restored on several occasions.  On each occasion, the Covenant was renewed following prescribed protocols.

There is a progression of ideas and concepts that flow from this series of significant events that speak to a Haudenosaunee perception of the Royal Proclamation of 1763.  Their approach to this document is perhaps best evidenced by the Haudenosaunee’s noticeable absence (except for seven Seneca war chiefs) at the Treaty of Niagara in 1764.  By 1764, the Seven Years War had ended with the defeat of the French. The successive renewals of the Covenant Chain and the British victory in the Seven Years War restored the Nanfan Treaty’s Beaver Hunting Grounds.  The Royal Proclamation was issued by the Crown to address the French and state the terms that would be taken to treaty with First Nations going forward.  The Haudenosaunee respected the Two Row by not interfering in how the British dealt with the French and other native nations.  Instead, the Haudenosaunee relied on the relationship established by the Covenant Chain.

PLEDGE OF THE CROWN BELT

This protocol was also respected during the American Revolution.  Following the defeat of the British, the British compensated the Haudenosaunee as their allies with the Haldimand Deed lands.  These lands were acquired from the Mississauga under the prescribed terms of the Royal Proclamation and awarded to the Haudenosaunee.  As far as the Haudenosaunee are concerned, this act suggests that the Covenant Chain relationship was still intact as separate from the Royal Proclamation decades after the Proclamation was issued.  In the War of 1812, the British and the Haudenosaunee, once again invoked the Covenant Chain.  Following the signing of the Treaty of Ghent, the Crown met with the Haudenosaunee and in the spring of 1815, presented them with the “Pledge of the Crown Belt,” which reiterated that all their possessions, rights and privileges (land, etc.) would be restored to them as they had been before 1812.

The Crown in Canada has enshrined the Royal Proclamation of 1763 as a foundational constitutional document.  In privileging this document, the Crown and Canadian government effectively ignore those agreements and relationships that preceded and followed it.  Today, the Haudenosaunee of the Grand River look to the Covenant Chain relationship and the Nanfan Treaty as informing negotiations with the Crown while making virtually no reference to the Royal Proclamation of 1763.

Keith Jamieson is the director of the Six Nations Legal Consortium.

This week ActiveHistory.ca will be running a special series of 14 essays jointly published with the Robarts Centre for Canadian Studies commemorating the 250th anniversary of the 1763 Royal Proclamation on 7 October. A full list of essays in this collection can be found here.

One thought on “The Haundenosaunee/Six Nations and the Royal Proclamation of 1763

  1. Tom Kennedy

    Royal Proclamation was the fuse of the American Revolution. Edmund Burke, an adviser to the cabinet warned if England accepted Canada rather than Guadulupe, the American Colonists, who were pushing to migrate west. It was not a “treaty” with aboriginals, but an attempt to halt expansion to the west.

Please note: ActiveHistory.ca encourages comment and constructive discussion of our articles. We reserve the right to delete comments submitted under aliases, or that contain spam, harassment, or attacks on an individual.