New paper: What Can “Oral History” Teach Us?

What if the study of the Canadian past was understood as an interdisciplinary field? Steven High’s new paper offers oral history as an example of an interdisciplinary craft that has made such a transition.  High, Canada Research Chair in Public History and Associate Professor of History at Concordia University, examines this and other issues surrounding oral history. is always looking for new papers to post on the site.  If you are interested in submitting a paper, please see our editorial guidelines.

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Blog posts published before October  28, 2018 are licensed with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Canada License.

One thought on “New paper: What Can “Oral History” Teach Us?

  1. Alexandra Rutherford

    Thanks for this excellent paper on oral history – as an active oral historian, I am often asked what oral history can add as “evidence” to historical arguments – to defend its value as a historical method. High’s points that it is the subjectivity of oral history that makes it most valuable and interesting, that it provides access to how people have made meaning about their experiences, and that that it redefines the investigative stance as “knowing with” rather than “knowing about” are important to remember.

Please note: encourages comment and constructive discussion of our articles. We reserve the right to delete comments submitted under aliases, or that contain spam, harassment, or attacks on an individual.