Oblivion stalks Postal Station K

      2 Comments on Oblivion stalks Postal Station K

Postal Station K. Image from “Save Historic Postal Station K” Facebook page.

by Tom Cohen

“Postal Station K!” Poetic resonance: none! Just one more slightly surplus postal station – in this age of electronic mail, a property easily unloaded, after all. A splendid spot on Yonge Street, in booming North Toronto, just perfect for a big condominium, with a shopping podium at sidewalk level. So sell it, right!

Now wait a minute. Take a good hard look at Station K. Look above the door, right between the lion and the unicorn. That’s “ER” – Elizabeth Regina, The Queen.

Ooops! Look again! Between the E and the R we have not “II” but “VIII”! Who in heaven’s name is that? Why, it’s Edward. Edward the Almost Eighth! The King Who Never Was, gave up the crown to marry Wallis Simpson and eke out his exiled life in love of Hitler. That “royal cipher” is a royal rarity. There are few indeed in Canada, or anywhere.


And keep on looking. On the facade, up high, in lozenges, we have the most modern transportation imaginable. In 1936. The expressest of trains, the zoomingest of bi-planes zipping down from geometric clouds, an athletic truck, a lunging ship.

Cool! Cool decor. And, after all, why not, as this building is a gem of Art Deco.

Just ready for the wrecker’s ball.

And then check out the benches. Popular. And check out the maple. Ailing. Salt damaged, like so many along our streets. Wade through the local pigeons (and remember that they are the lucky ones, not yet lunch for our local falcon family), and go across to the flagpole. And stop to read, in either official language, what stood here in the old days, before Station K was Station K.

Well, there was a hotel that burned down. Not on the plaque. But, before that, guess what stood here, at this splendid site of the next condo to hit the street:

Montgomery’s Tavern. Cradle of rebellion. Cradle of an (eventual) broader suffrage and more solid democracy in English Canada.

Right here.

OK folks, what is the lesson for us citizens?

I would say that lesson one is that you don’t sell off “the public realm” and privatize it without thinking.

Lesson two is that you don’t destroy a beautiful building just to make some money for the state.

Lesson three is that you don’t obliterate our history, be it national or local.

Lesson four, still to come, is that a buyer – and clearly the thing’s for sale – must never never demolish the structure. Nor can he or she be allowed to skin it alive and then wrap the facade, like some veneer, around a new glass box. The building, the old part (forget the featureless annex and the parking lot) deserves to stand, as is, no matter who buys it. And to have a use that involves the public, not be transformed into a lobby for a tower.

Now, what do we intelligent citizens do about this? Whom do we address? We can wrap ourselves in royal robes and address our royalist Prime Minister. We can halloo down at City Hall. We can alert the press. We can log on to Facebook and “friend” the “Friends of Postal Station K.”

But the larger thing, the one that matters, as history-minded activists and activist-inclined historians, is to engage the larger issue: how can we connect Toronto’s past, and pastness, with its presence, and its presents, in dialogue with “the state” on all its levels, and in conversation with capitalism too? Memory is a precious communal resource; we need to inject it back into our ever-evolving urban landscape, in every clever way we can imagine. But, to do that, we have to hold on to the material heritage, especially when, as here, it is so handsome.

Now: practical matters: Michael Colle, MPP for Station K, is in there, on our side, fighting and organizing. See his web page. And David Crombie, a neighbour, offers moral support. And Josh Matlow, councillor down here, is backing us. And Ken Greenberg, the famous planner, sends sympathy. We have friends in town. But we want more friends, so round them up and send them over. The more, the stronger we are. We are in rebellion mode, and eager for recruits.

Tom Cohen
History Department, York University
(Historian, it so happens, of Renaissance Rome, a city that displayed, deployed, and devoured its past: just ask assorted popes, or Mussolini)

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Blog posts published before October  28, 2018 are licensed with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Canada License.

2 thoughts on “Oblivion stalks Postal Station K

  1. Patrick Smyth

    Don’t ask, tell.

    Let’s not rail against progress, for we may get left behind once more. Let’s not set loose our height and density sniffer dogs, lest we chase off a great opportunity. What we need is a sensible review of what we’ve got at the North Toronto HighPoint site before we whip up a storm trying to save a building.

    I’m all for celebrating history and retaining culturally important edifices and views, but not for purely emotional reasons. It’s important to know if this building is in fact an ‘Art Deco’ one. To me, it looks minor in that regard, but I’m not an expert. I have searched where possible and see no particular mention of Stn K being of significant ‘Art Deco’ importance. Neither do I remember the interior of the building being of any great shakes when it comes to ‘Art Deco’. Agreed, it has a fine facade and some neat appendages.

    What the public realm needs is a plan. Here are two planning concepts the local community association (ARECA) has been working on with local planner Terry Mills (www.arris.ca). The first one http://midtownplan.ca/highpoint/HighPointHeritage.pdf takes an unemotional look at the heritage inventory, leaving the native peoples’ heritage aside for the moment. The second one http://midtownplan.ca/highpoint/highpoint.pdf stands back somewhat and takes a strategic look at how we could consider seeking a heritage neighbourhood designation.

    The Midtown area will have 15,000 more residents in the near future, that means lots more pressure on the public realm. How we tame that pressure will not be an easy task. It will require a disproportionate amount of cooperation from the development community. Hopefully, I believe making the public realm significantly better where their new condo-owners will reside will motivate developers to participate in this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.

    When the community lost the open space at the Yonge Eglinton corner David Crombie suggested creating a small museum in the closed-in space. RioCan promised to do just that. Nothing seems to be happening at the RioCan corner yet so maybe, with some considerate community planning, that’s where the artifacts from the vaults in Stn K could be displayed?

    As for what is significant in the walls of the building, that’s where some creative design could come into play.

  2. George Butterwick

    When I first heard that Postal Station K could become a site for a condominium I was flabbergasted. I attended a Rally that was put on by MPP Mike Colle in July, and the response was unbelievable. Mike asked me if I would help him get some petitions. The next day I sat out in front of the Post Office collecting signatures. The people that signed the petitions proved to be amazing. The number of signitures were escalating at an enormous rate by people that were infuriated. I spent all week collecting signatures and never expected to get over 500. I kept this up faithfully every day and here I am two weeks into September and the total number of petitions is over 2500. I worked at the Firehall across from this building for 35 years and there’s know way I want to see this historical building destroyed by a condominium. I want the people in this area to know that I’m fighting on their behalf and my prime concern is to stand firm until we achieve our objective. Because I have always applied myself 100% to whatever it is I take on . Throughout my life
    George Butterwick

Please note: ActiveHistory.ca encourages comment and constructive discussion of our articles. We reserve the right to delete comments submitted under aliases, or that contain spam, harassment, or attacks on an individual.