New Paper by J.R. Miller: Residential Schools and Reconciliation

ActiveHistory.ca is pleased to announce the publication of J.R. Miller’s paper, Residential Schools and Reconciliation

“Reconciliation” is a word that has gained great currency of late. It has been frequently used in discussions surrounding the Idle No More movement during the winter of 2012-13. But the term has a longer history in discussions in Canada concerning Native-newcomer relations. Notably, Chief Justice Antonio Lamer in the Supreme Court of Canada’s rulings in both the Van der Peet and Delgamuukw cases in 1996-97 made the point that the purpose of Section 35 of the constitution adopted in 1982 was “the reconciliation of the pre-existence of aboriginal societies with the sovereignty of the Crown.” That conception of the place of reconciliation in Canadian life is also relevant to the topic of residential schools and their legacy.
Read More

Editors Note: In addition to our group blog, ActiveHistory.ca strives to provide timely, well-written and thoroughly researched papers on a variety of history-related topics. This is an area of our website that we would like to develop further. If you have a paper that you think resonates well with our mandate please consider submitting a paper to us.  Expanded conference papers or short essays that introduce an upcoming book project are great starting points for the type of paper we publish. With a current readership of about 10,000 people per month we can assure that you will find an interested audience through our site.

For more information visit our Papers Section or contact papers@activehistory.ca. All of our papers are peer reviewed to ensure that they are accurate and up-to-date. 

History Wars: The Danger of the Broad Brush

      2 Comments on History Wars: The Danger of the Broad Brush

By Jim Clifford
Is Stephen Harper, as Terry Glavin argues, right to “not trust the history establishment“? Posts on this website and elsewhere do suggest that a broad spectrum of Canadian historians disagree with Harper’s use of history. Does this vocal minority represent the establishment? If not, who makes up the establishment? The Canadian Historical Association’s executive members? Leading historians at the large graduate programs?

Glavin’s column pivots from mentioning the concerns of Tom Mulcair and Scott Simms with the Conservative’s efforts to re-brand Canadian history to rehashing Jack Granatstein’s critique against “faddish social histories” from the 1990s (a fad that appears to have outlasted three to four generations of popular culture fads). Glavin, an author who has written a number of books about indigenous history, laments:

If it’s “a proud national story rooted in the great deeds of our ancestors” you’re after, the very last place to go looking for it would be the history faculty of a Canadian university.

To bolster his argument, Glavin interviewed Christopher Dummitt (the author of a great history blog, Everyday History), who began his career as a historian of masculinity, to confirm the Conservatives are

“right not to trust us… The historical profession has become kind of an activist organization. The result is we have lost authority, as a discipline, and we can’t talk about history writ large.”

Continue reading

Alliance Against Modern Slavery’s Third Annual Conference: Modern Slavery in Ontario and the World

In his Histoire du Canada (1846), François Garneau promulgated the myth that slavery never existed in New France. He congratulated King Louis XIV and the French colonial clergy for having saved Canada from this “grand and terrible plague.” Following suit, Canadians have accepted this claim despite the historical evidence of at least 4,000 slaves in New France alone, two-thirds of whom were Aboriginal. In 2013, these misconceptions about the history of slavery in Canada continue, and today Aboriginals make up the largest proportion of human trafficking victims in Canada.

Slavery is routinely dismissed as an historical artifact, and there is the tendency to downplay or disregard the historical dimensions of current complex and enduring problems. Confronting the longstanding mythology surrounding slavery in Canada has proved critical to policy efforts to combat this pernicious practice.

This February 23rd dozens of NGOs, law enforcement, students, community members, survivors, researchers, and more will be coming together in Toronto to learn, network, and share about how we can work together to end slavery. Continue reading

Podcast: “Beyond Orange and Green: Toronto’s Irish, 1870-1914” by William Jenkins

William Jenkins

William Jenkins

The 2013 History Matters lecture series kicked off on January 31st, when migration historian William Jenkins (York University) gave a talk to a crowded room at the Parliament branch of the Toronto Public Library.  His presentation examined immigration patterns and political allegiances of Toronto’s Irish between 1870 and World War I, and how struggles at home and abroad had an impact on the Catholic and Protestant Irish communities in the city.

Jenkin’s talk was based on research for his upcoming book, Between Raid and Rebellion: The Irish in Buffalo and Toronto, 1867-1916, which will be published this spring by McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Click here to listen to a podcast of the talk.

The next talk in the 2013 History Matters series takes place at the Dufferin/St. Clair Branch of the Toronto Public Library on February 28th from 6:30-8pm. Award-winning migration, labour, and gender historian Dr. Franca Iacovetta (University of Toronto) will explore the International Institute Movement’s use of public spectacle and pageantry to promote cultural pluralism in a pre-multicultural Toronto.  Click here for more information on this and other talks in the series.

More Canadian History, More Better

      4 Comments on More Canadian History, More Better

By Sean Kheraj

Consul General Anton K. Smith speaking at War of 1812 commemorative event with Minister Peter McKay. Source: "CG Anton K Smith" by US Mission Canada

Consul General Anton K. Smith speaking at War of 1812 commemorative event with Minister Peter McKay. Source: “CG Anton K Smith” by US Mission Canada

“Canada’s history is worth emphasizing,” according to a recent pathetically inoffensive editorial headline in the Globe and Mail. Such an argument is so bland and broad as to be almost entirely pointless. What drove the editorial team at the Globe to boldly stick its neck out with such a feeble statement? The temerity of the Leader of the Official Opposition, Thomas Mulcair, and his critique of the federal government for its use of historical commemorative events as “political branding” and a form of “jingoism.” “If it is an act of “jingoism” to commemorate such events, or to mark the bicentennial of the War of 1812,” according to the Globe, “then let’s have more of it. These are critical opportunities to educate Canadians about their history and thereby enhance their identity.” In short, more Canadian history means more better!

How can one criticize a government for devoting resources to raise awareness of Canadian history? As James Carville might say, “It’s the emphasis, stupid.” What history is worth emphasizing and how should it be emphasized? Whose stories do we tell and how do we tell them? These questions actually matter. To historians and public history professionals these questions are obvious and basic. By implication, the Globe and its sympathetic readers, argue that any effort to place emphasis on any aspect of the past is a good thing. It is simply a “wise recognition of the need to celebrate Canadian identity.” The argument is either ignorantly oblivious to the significance and political weight of public commemoration or it is dishonest. Either way, it is embarrassing to see in print. Continue reading

“Can I trust you not to shoot me?” A Different Approach to the Gun Debate.

By Stephen Duane Dean Junior

In 1487, Godfrey O’Donnell killed a Breifre O’Rourke with what was most likely a primitive cast iron hand cannon. Detailed in the Annals of the Four Masters, the text differs on the wording regarding what to call the new weapon. What was less uncertain was that the new weapon could only be trusted in the hands of those loyal to the English state and kept out of the hands of the local Gaels. 355 years later in a debate about what to do about the gun in Ireland in the House of Commons caused one man to remark that ‘ take from honest men the means of defence, and will not deprive the turbulent and the lawless of the means of aggression.’ (ARMS (IRELAND) BILL. House of Commons Deb 29 May 1843 vol. 69 cc996-1063) On January 30 of this year, the Irish Labour whip Ms Hayden stated that ‘it is shocking to think there are criminals – drug dealers and other forms of low -life – who walk around in this country and seem to have no difficulty whatsoever accessing firearms.’

Firearms have always caused consternation when they fall into the hands of those deemed unworthy of their use. Whether a killing field in 1487 or remarks made to reporters in 2013 the debate about the gun has a certain timelessness. Unlike some other commentators this brief piece is not going to on the intent of the founding fathers of the American Revolution, or the nuances of meaning by the framers of the Bill of Rights. Rather, it is to put firearms in a different context. It is about what the gun represents. What is has always represented.

Recently, the recurrent debate on gun ownership has been galvanizing two very different narratives of what the legacy of the right to bear arms is to be and what it might become. Taking a look at a different world entirely may provide an alternative starting point to an often muddled discussion. I will cover a major theme of my own work, and how it might be applied to the current debates taking place in small towns and urban conglomerations throughout America in churches, cafes, bars and boardrooms. Continue reading

Exploring the Old Canadian Internet: Spelunking in the Internet Archive

Spoiler alert! Breaking news! Bre-X shares don't do so well in 1997. Click for the site.

Spoiler alert! Breaking news! Bre-X shares don’t do so well in 1997. Click for the site.

By Ian Milligan

If you do recent history, you run into problems pretty quickly with archives. Chronic underfunding means that many recent acquisitions sit, awaiting cataloguing. Donor restrictions are often still in place, and – probably most importantly – much of this material is still not archived as it isn’t always thought of as history yet! If you aren’t part of an institution or working at a (well-funded) library, you might not also even be able to access old newspapers: queries get greeted with paywalls, or you have to satisfy yourself with just a free trial.

Luckily, by the mid-1990s, Canadians were increasingly online: this is where many chatted, others explored, some panicked (the cyberporn panic of the 1990s!), and the first traces of our digital past began to be left for all to consume. The Internet Archive’s WayBackMachine lets you go back to the “olden days” of the early internet, from 1996 onwards, and see what was out there. Continue reading

Video Contest: 2013 National Council on Public History Annual Meeting in Ottawa

“Kodak Magazine 8.” Photo by Jon Rutlin. Source: Flickr. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic.

“Kodak Magazine 8.” Photo by Jon Rutlin. Source: Flickr. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic.

Coming to the 2013 National Council on Public History Annual Meeting in Ottawa this spring? Enter to win our video contest! Prizes are from NCPH and Canada’s History.

Create a 1-2 minute video introducing yourself and your audience (our theme this year is “Knowing your Public(s)—The Significance of Audiences in Public History”), post your video to Youtube and email us the link (ncph@iupui.edu) by March 11. We will add your submissions to this playlist.

Voting for the “People’s Choice” winner will be conducted March 16-29. Winning videos will be awarded in the People’s Choice and Committees Choice categories and will be announced onsite at the 2013 NCPH Annual Meeting in Ottawa!

The Drake “Smoke Screen” Phenomenon: A Podcast Discussion with Dalton Higgins on Drake and Canadian Hip Hop History

Higgins, speaking to the audience at Accents on Eglinton.

Dalton Higgins, speaking to the audience at Accents on Eglinton.

On December 8, 2012, Accents on Eglinton, a community bookstore that specializes in publications on Africa and its diasporas, along with host Francesca D’Amico (PhD candidate in music history at York University), hosted an evening with Dalton Higgins, award-winning journalist, radio and TV broadcaster, to discuss his latest book Far From Over: The Music and Life of Drake (ECW Press).

Far From Over is the first biography to trace the rise of platinum-selling Hip Hop emcee, songwriter and actor, Aubrey Drake Graham (who records under the mononym Drake). Higgins’ publication outlines Drake’s early years in the wealthy neighbourhood of Forest Hill in Toronto, his initial entry into the Canadian popular culture industry as Jimmy Brooks on the hit show Degrassi: The Next Generation, and finally his transition into the Canadian and later American urban music market. By eloquently detailing the social and cultural conditions in Toronto that helped create what Higgins has termed the “Drake Phenomenon,” the author has provided readers with a platform by which to understand and discuss the nature of Canada’s culture industry, as well as issues of identity, multiculturalism and belonging in a changing nation.

Dalton Higgins and Francesca D'Amico

Dalton Higgins and Francesca D’Amico

Over the course of the evening, Higgins and D’Amico engaged in a conversation that intended to use the life and music of Drake as a lens by which to discuss broader issues such as: the history of urban music in Toronto in particular and Canada at large; class and authenticity in urban music; race, ethnicity, identity and notions of multiculturalism and acceptance in Canada; the role of media and industry; Canada’s music industry infrastructure; the changing nature of music and technology; and the current state of Canadian urban music in a global market.

Click here to listen to a podcast of the discussion and click here for a direct link to ECW Press’ purchase page for Far From Over: The Music and Life of Drake.

 

Trunks & Trains: Summers at Winnipeg Beach

      1 Comment on Trunks & Trains: Summers at Winnipeg Beach

By Ruthann LaBlance

Winnipeg Beach: Leisure and Courtship in a Resort Town, 1900–1967
Dale Barbour
University of Manitoba Press
Paperback, 264 pages, $24.95WinnipegBeach

Dale Barbour’s Winnipeg Beach: Leisure and Courtship in a Resort Town, 1900–1967 chronicles the rise and fall of a Manitoba resort community. Not only does Barbour craft a history of Winnipeg Beach, he explores how ideas of public dating influenced the resort’s growth and popularity. Established at the turn of the twentieth century, Winnipeg Beach was marketed by the Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) as a summer resort community, and its popularity continued to be intimately tied to that of the railway. Despite advertising aimed at the upper classes, Winnipeg quickly became the vacation destination for Canadians of various backgrounds. As its popularity with the working classes rose, the CPR shifted its marketing of Winnipeg Beach specifically to young men and women as the ideal location to meet someone special in the countryside. At its peak popularity, the beach was the go-to meeting place for young Winnipeggers.

Barbour spends a considerable amount of time demonstrating how Winnipeg Beach emerged as the premier location for young adults eighteen to thirty years old, along with why the transition from private courtship to public dating made the beach such a popular destination. The specially designed boardwalk, amusement area, and dance hall allowed young adults a safe, comfortable, and, above all else, fun location to mix and mingle with members of the opposite sex. Barbour argues that from the 1920s to the 1940s, the public areas in and around the boardwalk afforded a degree of privacy, but not enough to cause a moral panic. In this setting, young adults could gather, yet still remain under the watchful eye of society. Nevertheless, a moral panic concerning youth culture in the 1950s and 1960s, along with the shift from trains to cars as more popular mode of transportation, contributed to the decline of Winnipeg Beach. As Barbour explains, a busy train could deposit 1,600 people at a time on the boardwalk, and the excitement of an arriving train brought a buzz of activity to the beach. By 1961, however, regular passenger service to Winnipeg Beach was cancelled.

Barbour has created a well-written and -researched history of Winnipeg Beach that is accessible to all interested readers. He outlines his arguments in the introduction in a straightforward manner, and provides the reader a clear path to follow. Barbour uses each chapter to build upon the foundation laid out in the introduction, adding additional detail to his narrative. However, while a certain amount of repetition is expected and welcomed in an account such as this, I was surprised by the degree of restatement of certain information. Chapters often feel like they were designed to be stand-alone articles, as many subjects are re-examined in detail without adding significantly to the argument. This unfortunate redundancy makes the work feel longer than necessary and may distract the reader from the merits of Barbour’s arguments.

As I read, I was certainly able to piece together a clear picture of Winnipeg Beach. Barbour effectively discusses the initial establishment of the resort and details the role that the CPR played in its formation. I do think this book would have benefited from the use of a map or two to better contextualize the location of Winnipeg Beach in this area of Manitoba. He discusses other resorts in the region, but without a map it is difficult to imagine how Grand Beach or Victoria Beach might have served as competition. Barbour also could have made better use of the photographs found throughout the book. I found it curious that a photo of the Empress Hotel, with a caption mentioning its well-known bar, is found amongst a discussion of the experiences of various ethnicities at the beach, rather than with the details of the hotel in the text. Similarly, an advertisement from 1920 is discussed at some length on page 33, yet a reproduction of the advertisement itself is found three pages later. These are but two examples of odd layout choices that make the book feel jumbled and unorganized at times.

Despite these shortcomings, Barbour has crafted a very readable history of Winnipeg Beach that illustrates well the type of summer-time fun that this area provided for countless people throughout much of the twentieth century.

Ruthann Lablance is a public historian and Manager of Digitization at the Ontario Genealogical Society. She holds an M.A. in Public History from the University of Western Ontario.