
Matthew Hurst
Access to sources determines what can and cannot be researched. Outside of academia, access also affects the public’s capacity to maintain a tangible link to the past. Collections are especially important for expatriate communities. In this post, I describe how Hong Kong’s diasporic communities are being denied access to 88,000 records created during the colonial era.
In a recent Active History contribution, June Chow wrote about a successful collaboration between academics and archivists that resulted in a positive outcome for the Chinese Canadian community. Chow submitted an Access to Information and Privacy request to Library and Archives Canada, which in turn suggested that a block request would be more appropriate. This block request led to the opening of a significant number of files relating to the 1923 Chinese Exclusion Act and revealed hitherto unknown stories of injustice, activism and family reunion. In Chow’s case, researchers and information professionals worked together to unlock records that have brought insights to the Chinese Canadian community. This was a success story; however, not all attempts to access information end in this way.
Continue reading





